Not that this is really news. Mother Jones investigates the Hillary 2008 campaign’s specific characterizations of Obama’s position thus:
Clinton and her aides have been peddling false information about Obama to undercut one of his primary arguments: she voted for the war; I was against it. Engaging in such disingenuous attacks may help Clinton beat back Obama, but it is hardly the way for her to counter Obama’s claim that she represents poltics-as-usual. It only proves his point.
Andrew Sullivan explains the strategy behind this move. It seems clear though that the Clintons are banking on the laziness and gullibility of the American people.