People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn’t have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless.
Of course, Stephen Hawking is and always has been British – having lived and worked and been taken care of by this system.
All this is to say nothing of the various other canards raised – namely that any of the current plans being debated bear any resemblance to the British single-payer and entirely government-run system.
The editorial also explains:
The British have succeeded in putting a price tag on human life, as we are about to.
Matt Yglesias nicely parries this point:
[A]s with all anti-rationing talk you really have to wonder what rightwingers think happens in a free market system. In a pure market, your life is worth what you’re able to pay. The way the free market works, if an indigent woman gives birth to a premature infant you let the infant die. Thankfully, no country—not even the US of A—is actually sufficiently committed to free market principles to let infants die like that.
Related articles on 2parse (because you know you want to read more…)
- Prominent Liberal Blogger: Obama acting exactly as if he does have a secret “death committee”!!!
- Stop ObamaCare Before Obama Murders Your Comatose Wife and Infant Daughter!
- Our Unhinged Debate on Health Care Reform
- Theories of the Financial Crisis: Deference to the Financial Sector
- The One Statistic That Helps Explain The Need For Health Care Reform
- How The Need For Health Care Reform Undermines the Legitimacy of the State