The NYT and WaPo bet their reputations on contrasting approaches to climate emails.

James Fallows:

Not to overdramatize, but: in a way the papers are betting their reputations with these articles. The Times, that climate change is simply a matter of science versus ignorance; the Post, that this is best treated as another “-Gate” style flap where it’s hard to get to the bottom of the story.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Wikio

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply