As I posted previously – there has been a lot of anger by a significant subset of Obama supporters at his reversal on how he would oppose the telecom immunity provision in the FISA bill.
As part of the group that is the center of much of this protest – “Senator Obama – Please Vote NO on Telecom Immunity – Get FISA Right“ – I have had a front-row seat to observe the raw feelings of the most disappointed supporters. I argued in my previous post that many of these supporters had lost perspective – as they abandoned Obama over a position that was a rather minor element in his campaign.
But one thing my response missed – and most of the angry Obama supporters missed – is precisely what Obama changed his mind about.
Obama – through a spokesperson – had promised to support a filibuster of any law that would give the telecommunications companies immunity from civil liability for their actions relating to the warrantless wiretapping program:
To be clear: Barack will support a filibuster of any bill that includes retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies
Throughout his campaign, this promise was reiterated.
In February, Obama voted to strip away the provision that gave the telecoms immunity from the FISA bill – but the amendment failed to garner sufficient votes to override a presidential veto.
As the FISA bill came up for a vote this July, Obama announced that he had changed his mind about the degree to which he would oppose telecom immunity. Yesterday, he voted for an amendment that would strip the immunity provisions from the FISA bill, but voted to pass the bill even though the amendment failed to get the required support.
In other words, while he still agrees with the position that the telecom companies should not get immunity, he has made a tactical decision that the costs of opposing the full measure were not worth the benefits.
Many who have expressed disagreement with Obama have talked about how he has changed his mind about defending the Constitution, how he is now agreeing to eviserate the Fourth Amendment, etcetera and so on. They argue against the full FISA law itself – as well as the telecom immunity provision. But although Obama has said that he sees the law as flawed, he did not commit himself to opposing it.
Most of those who are disillusioned by Obama’s vote don’t seem be interested in the subtlties. They speak in terms of betrayal, in terms of being with-us-or-against-us, and they judge Obama harshly by an ideological purity scale. But if any of these people had evaluated Obama seriously before – they would have seen that he was not the ideological purist they claim he was.
As Gail Collins put it in an insightful column today (an unusual event for her):
But if you look at the political fights he’s picked throughout his political career, the main theme is not any ideology. It’s that he hates stupidity. “I don’t oppose all wars. What I am opposed to is a dumb war,” he said in 2002 in his big speech against the invasion of Iraq. He did not, you will notice, say he was against unilateral military action or pre-emptive attacks or nation-building. He was antidumb.
Most of the things Obama’s taken heat for saying this summer fall into these two familiar patterns — attempts to find a rational common ground on controversial issues and dumb-avoidance.
On the common-ground front, he’s called for giving more federal money to religious groups that run social programs, but only if the services they offer are secular. People can have guns for hunting and protection, but we should crack down on unscrupulous gun sellers. Putting some restrictions on the government’s ability to wiretap is better than nothing, even though he would rather have gone further.
Dumb-avoidance would include his opposing the gas-tax holiday, backtracking on the anti-Nafta pandering he did during the primary and acknowledging that if one is planning to go all the way to Iraq to talk to the generals, one should actually pay attention to what the generals say.
Touching both bases are Obama’s positions that 1) if people are going to ask him every day why he’s not wearing a flag pin, it’s easier to just wear the pin, for heaven’s sake, and 2) there’s nothing to be gained by getting into a fight over whether the death penalty can be imposed on child rapists.
I’ll take this opportunity to point out that Collins is misleading about how she uses the death penalty example as Obama indicated he was in favor of the death penalty for child rapists before the recent Supreme Court decision in The Audacity of Hope.
But her basic point is right.
16 replies on “Barack Obama, FISA, and Telecom Immunity”
Thank you for every other informative blog. Where else may I am getting that type of info
written in such an ideal way? I have a challenge that I’m just now working on, and I have been at the look out for such info.
My spouse and I stumbled over here different
page and thought I might as well check things
out. I like what I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to exploring your web page for a second time.
Of course, what a fantastic blog and enlightening posts, I surely will bookmark your site.Best Regards!
When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get several e-mails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Bless you!
Usually I do not read article on blogs, but I wish to say that this write-up very compelled me to check out and do so! Your writing style has been amazed me. Thank you, quite nice post.
Thank you for each of your effort on this blog. Betty delights in going through investigation and it is simple to grasp why. A lot of people hear all regarding the lively medium you present efficient thoughts via this web blog and even increase response from others on this concern and our favorite simple princess is always becoming educated a whole lot. Take advantage of the rest of the year. You have been conducting a fabulous job.
Fantastic beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your site, how can i subscribe for a blog site? The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear concept
wonderful put up, very informative. I wonder why the opposite experts of this sector do not notice this. You should continue your writing. I am confident, you have a huge readers’ base already!
I like the helpful information you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I’m quite certain I’ll learn a lot of new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!
I will immediately grab your rss as I can’t find your email subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any? Please let me know so that I could subscribe. Thanks.
ロレックス新作
業界No.1のChrome Hearts クロムハーツ スーパーコピー レプリカ専門店 クロムハーツ(Chrome Hearts) 人気のクロムハーツのコピー商品通販!新作クロムハーツバッグ・財布などの商品や情報満載!人気、実力ともに日本N0_1の本格的なブランドシルバーアクセサリレプリカ専門店です。-純銀屋 当店ブラックシンフォニーでは、直接全米のクロムハーツより定期的にアイテムを取寄せて販売しております。 入荷の情報に関しましては、その都度当店の入荷ブログにて写真つきで更新しております。 Chr…
スーパーコピーブランド財布N級品
【祝開店!大放出セール開催中】 あなたは自由船積みを楽しむことができます 新品入荷大特価!限定SALE! 激安専門オンラインストア 激安 おすすめSALE! 『2018年春夏新作』5☆大好評! SALE賛発売! 【正規品!】☆安心の全品国内発送! 人気【新品】店里最受迎! 業界最高峰!全国一律送料無料! 最良の取引店へようこそ お急ぎ便利用で当日、翌日にお届け。 【送料無料市場】今季★大特恵 『上品な』激安本物 オフ75%安いが貯まる!
激安ブランドのオーデマピゲ腕時計
2019年人気貴族エルメス コピー安心専門店、 一流ブランドショップ、シャネル コピー、 付属品完備!送料は無料です(日本全国)! ご注文を期待しています!100%品質保証 満足保。※日本國送料無料、信用第一、
グッチ 指輪 スーパーコピー 時計
ウブロコピー 販売,ウブロスーパーコピー時計特集 弊社は正規品と同等品質のウブロコピーN品を低価でお客様に提供します。 当店時計はスイス製のムーブメントを採用しています、最先端技術でスーパーコピーを研究し。 2019新作続々入荷! お買い得品満載、一見の価値あり!
2021年人気最新品、新素材!
には、ルイヴィトンコピー、シャネルコピー、グッチコピー、コーチコピー、ロレックスコピー、プラダコピー、ブルガリ財布コピーその他小物等、
ブランド品、、ルイヴィトン、PRADA、Coach、GUCCI、CHANEL、BVLGARI、デュポン、ROLEX時針
各種海外有名ブランド品を豊富に取り揃え、しかもお客様を第一と考えて、驚きの低価格で提供しております。
税関の没収する商品は再度無料にして発送します。
広大な客を歓迎して買います!
3-6日にきっと引き渡す.
2021年人気最新品、新素材!
には、ルイヴィトンコピー、シャネルコピー、グッチコピー、コーチコピー、ロレックスコピー、プラダコピー、ブルガリ財布コピーその他小物等