Categories
Election 2008 Politics

The Beginning of the End of Hillary 2008

Maybe Senator Obama had a bit more reason to be satisfied after last night’s debate than I thought. The focus of all the coverage I have seen has been on Clinton’s dissembling and the relentless attacks on her. As the Politico says: “When Hillary has a bad night, she has a really bad night.” Drudge is reporting that Hillary is blaming Tim Russert for being too tough on her:

CLINTON INNER-CIRCLE BLAME ‘UNFAIR’ MODERATOR TIM RUSSERT. ‘HE BORDERED ON THE UNPROFESSIONAL,’ TOP HILLARY ADVISER CHARGES. ‘HE BROKE DEBATE RULES AND WAS BELLIGERENT’…

Last night actually made me respect Russert all the more because he took no bullshit from Hillary. She kept trying to avoid answering his questions, keeping her position “fuzzy”, and he tried to get her to give a clear answer. He also seemed to have prepared statements Hillary had made refuting every point she was kind of making. With as long a career in the public eye as Hillary has had, I think she could have brushed off these challenges by taking a solid stand last night. Instead she made it worse, reminding us that her husband was the first president to question what the meaning of is is.

Clinton still has a formidable campaign, but I believe the weakness she demonstrated last night spells the beginning of the end. She’s not going to win the news cycle by blaming her lack of candor on Tim Russert. And she will not get sympathy for being attacked because she has cultivated a reputation for being ruthless in attacking her opponents. Most of all, with primary voters and caucus goers deciding which candidate is best suited to beat the Republican nominee come next November, this night will loom large. Given all her experience in the public eye, given her practical incumbency, one would expect her to be able to give the appearance of being straight-forward, of directly answering questions instead of getting annoyed when anyone points out she is merely mouthing platitudes.

Regarding my hand-picked candidate: Obama didn’t do enough. He did not make his case. I am not sure if this was intentional or not. Obviously Edwards came off very strong. He was aggressive and forceful. He demonstrated an instinct for zoning in on the kill. Here, his trial experience must have been very helpful.

But few people saw Edwards’s strong performance last night; and although the headlines and stories all mention Edwards’s good performance, they include it as a footnote to the main story: Hillary had a really bad night.

If Obama had performed at the top of his game, I am not sure it would have stood out amidst the carnage. Perhaps – and this is wishful thinking on my part – he did not want to be known for taking out Hillary. Rather, he wanted to make his case when he could be positive. The question everyone was asking before the latest national polls showing Hillary with a 20% lead was how Obama could get Edwards to do the dirty work of taking out Clinton for him. If that was the goal, Obama succeeded last night. Given Edwards’s lack of a national campaign structure and relative weakness in the money race, Obama still stands most to benefit from Clinton’s stumblings. What he needs to do now is to present a compelling positive vision of his view for America. Now.

Related articles

44 replies on “The Beginning of the End of Hillary 2008”

Are you aware in the classic Hollywood plot how the protagonist must inevitably suffer a setback so that the effort of overcoming that setback lets them grow personally and defeat the antagonist?

Keeping that in mind I think she took a fall intentionally so she looks all the better when she “comes back” later on.

Obama is the same as Hillary. His policies are the same. He just has different rhetoric. The reason he’s losing is that Hillary’s rhetoric appeals to all people whereas Obama only appeals to a certain segment. But that doesn’t matter because they would push for the SAME policies in the White House.

I disagree with you Shii.

in Obama, I saw someone cool and dispassionate who wants to see a change in the way things are done. in Clinton, I saw someone who wants to be whatever she needs to be to win. every politician plays politics if he or she is to have any chance of success, but character and principles, though inevitably tarnished, are real and are there – especially in many of the first-tier candidates.

if you look at Obama’s positions, he has a lot of the same ones as Hillary and the rest: he wants to contain Iran as much as possible, to get out of Iraq as soon as is responsible, to curtail terrorism if possible. where you see Obama’s real differences though are in how he believes these items should be done. also, looking at many of Obama’s ideas that are popular among the netroots, redditors, etc, you will see that they are process-oriented.

Obama wants to allow Americans to “Google their government” and pledged to institute a reform that would make many government records public and accessible via the internet. Obama believes in net neutrality to ensure a more open democratic process. Obama speaks of restoring civil liberties and the balance of power in Washington because the Bush administration has wrecked the processes that have traditionally governed how the government can violate civil liberties and how the branches balance on another.

Obama has refused to commit to certain ends: such as universal health care, withdrawing all combat troops by a date certain, supporting gay marriage, or committing to refrain from military action against Iran. these positions have made him unpopular. but they are based on his focus on process instead of ends.

Hillary on the other hand has focused on keeping her true positions secret and releasing only carefully calculated statements and positions. my impression is that she is more focused on the ends of what she thinks needs to happen, as Edwards is. worse than Edwards, though, I believe Hillary would consolidate many of the abuses Bush has started when it comes to presidential power.

i think a focus on accomplishing certain ends often is ineffective, and post-Bush and Cheney, who focused entirely on the ends of what they wanted to happen, we need someone to tend to the processes and re-establish them. also, i trust Obama’s positions.

End the war.
Move the military HERE, where they can actually protect us.
Take the money we save from the military and rescue Social Security.
Kill the Patriot Act and restore the Constitution.
Repeal every single Bush executive order that breaks the law.
Drop corporate welfare.
Stabilize the dollar and end inflation by allowing sound currency to compete with the Fed.
Let medical care be a relationship between doctors and patients, and not government and insurance corporations.
Make America free and great again.

Vote for Ron Paul.

thank you Shii – i didn’t make the connection between your comment here and on reddit.

Sure, and how come Tim Russert can be tough now and not get fooled by bullshit answers, but where was his wit when Dick Cheney and the rest of the gang where promoting the path to war on his show five years ago? He swallowed the bait with hook and line and NEVER had a tough question on his show. His show was the administration’s FAVORITE megaphone for dissinformation and propaganda for so many years. Rumsfeld was ever trying to avoid answering his questions, keeping his position “fuzzy”,? Nah! And did he try then to get a clear answer?

I’ll never forget nor forgive Tim Russert for that. Hillary may have her flaws, but she is no neocon!

Hillary is indeed scary. Obama is the least scary of the candidates who maintain corporate sponsoship.

Take a look at Ron Paul http://www.ronpaul2008.com

you might find that you both like the positions and the man, as his supporters are drawn as much from the disenchanted democrats as they are from the disenchanted republicans.

Ron Paul and Kucinich are the logical choices- which means both will be either smeared or ignored by the media.

The ruling class always wins. This time, a Clinton is playing ball WITH the ruling class (unlike her husband- and look what happened to him: smeared).

It will always be business as usual. The next president will be Clinton or Giuliani. And there’s really nothing anyone can do about it, unless you have a massive “information revolution” – meaning the mainstream media (which leans to the conservative and demonizes dissent) must be overhauled .

bc: I’ll just assume you meant to say “the mainstream media (which leans to the liberal and demonizes dissent) must be overhauled”..

A conservative bias in the media? Except for Fox, I don’t know how you could substantiate that..

All government officials must obey the Constitution. Illegal immigration, the “war” in Iraq, the PATRIOT ACT, are all unconstitutional! yet where is hilary? Where is Obama on these important issues? Where are any of these piss poor candidates on the issues that are really important- like preserving individual rights and minding our own business as a nation? IF our government officials just obeyed the constitution, our country would not be in the state it is in today, aned the only way they will do that is if We the People demand it!

Kucinich was pretty much able to win the debate, despite only being given 4 minutes out of 2 hours. I mean, do we need more blood on our hands?

I work in this business. Corporate media has a conservative bias. Fox is just more biased than the rest– and it borders on propaganda. From CBS to CNN to NBC– their job is to deflect and misinform the masses. “Liberal media” is a lie repeated by people hired by who? Corporate media.

Ron Paul is a dream.
He is campaigning for return to the Constitution, somewhat selective applied, towards the Federal government. Repeal of the Income tax and social security etc. The federal government would have but two functions; Defense and enforcing contracts. He also calls for a withdrawal from Iraq. Everyone is free to take care of themselves and their retirement. Very appealing for young folks. After all who want to pay for our current fiscal mess?

I like the idea of using the Constitution to conduct Government. Particularly as much of it has disappeared in the past 6 years. Rep. Paul’s vision sounds like a great fit for the United States of 1789. It was largely a country agrarian people who lived somewhat independently of other states and the rest of the world. Things have changed however.

Recent headlines about spiking CO2 in the atmosphere and the loss of Artic Ice can’t be denied. I am afraid we are going to have to work together even more as a country and as a species to change our use of energy. Ignoring the problem is a lousy long term strategy however comforting in the short term.

Indeed how would shutting down our federal regulatory agencies save us from the power of large corporations. I don’t think any individual state can have any influence on say, Chevron or General Electric or the control of National media by a few large corporations. If you think private HMO’s or Energy companies have your best interests at heart, you are in a dream state.
I know this sounds like an exercise is irony at present.

And social security wasn’t approved on a whim. There is such a thing as a common good and when we can work together as a nation, we can do great things.

The wonderful thing about the Paul campaign and also Dennis Kucinich’s is that they bring up fundamental questions about where we are as a nation and where we are heading. May they continue to rise in the polls.

I’m seeing a lot about Ron Paul. I listened to Ron Paul. For the millions of people without health insurance, so what. For the exploding deficit, you know the money we owe other countries waiting to forclose, abolish the irs. hmmm
I get a feeling Ron Paul is this season’s Ross Perot. He’s saying all kinds of things that get attention, but in the end impossible to carry out.

I doubt if ANY “regular Joe” knows our country’s complete situation, all available options, and what can work. I’m sure Ron has character, but we need more than that.

As a long time democrat — I cannot even fathom one of these candidates running our country. Status quo — simple as that. I have changed my affiliation to vote for Ron Paul after discovering his policies and what he stands for. This vote is really a no brainer.

Ron Paul seems to be a libertarian skipper to the republican party…We need someone in office that knows how to work with people, not just get votes for being someone other than Hillary or Giulliani or whoever.

I’m not saying I have a real clear idea on who that is, but it will be someone who didn’t just jump ship to gain a nod.

Its like you read my mind! You seem to know so much approximately this, such as you wrote the ebook in it or something. I feel that you could do with a few percent to pressure the message home a bit, however other than that, this is wonderful blog. An excellent read. I will definitely be back.

Thanks for giving your ideas here. The other thing is that whenever a problem occurs with a computer system motherboard, people should not go ahead and take risk involving repairing that themselves for if it is not done correctly it can lead to permanent damage to the entire laptop. In most cases, it is safe to approach the dealer of your laptop for the repair of that motherboard. They’ve already technicians who may have an knowledge in dealing with laptop computer motherboard troubles and can have the right diagnosis and undertake repairs.

Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading correctly. I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue. I’ve tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same results.

I was recommended this website via my cousin. I am not certain whether or not this publish is written by him as no one else recognise such distinct approximately my difficulty. You’re wonderful! Thanks!

Hi there! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could find a captcha plugin for my comment form? I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having trouble finding one? Thanks a lot!

Sweet blog! I found it while surfing around on Yahoo News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thanks

hey there and thank you to your info – I have definitely picked up something new from proper here. I did alternatively experience a few technical issues using this website, since I experienced to reload the site a lot of instances prior to I may get it to load correctly. I had been pondering if your web host is OK? Now not that I am complaining, however sluggish loading instances times will very frequently affect your placement in google and can harm your high-quality rating if ads and ***********|advertising|advertising|advertising and *********** with Adwords. Well I’m adding this RSS to my email and could look out for much extra of your respective interesting content. Make sure you replace this again soon..

I believe that avoiding ready-made foods will be the first step so that you can lose weight. They will often taste very good, but highly processed foods have very little vitamins and minerals, making you feed on more simply to have enough strength to get through the day. If you’re constantly having these foods, changing to whole grains and other complex carbohydrates will make you to have more vitality while feeding on less. Thanks alot : ) for your blog post.

Thanks for the helpful write-up. It is also my belief that mesothelioma cancer has an incredibly long latency phase, which means that the signs of the disease would possibly not emerge right until 30 to 50 years after the original exposure to asbestos fiber. Pleural mesothelioma, which can be the most common style and has effects on the area within the lungs, might result in shortness of breath, breasts pains, as well as a persistent coughing, which may produce coughing up maintain.

I believe that avoiding ready-made foods is a first step in order to lose weight. They may taste beneficial, but ready-made foods have very little nutritional value, making you eat more only to have enough power to get over the day. When you are constantly feeding on these foods, changing to whole grains and other complex carbohydrates will help you have more strength while ingesting less. Interesting blog post.

I have noticed that in unwanted cameras, special receptors help to concentrate automatically. The sensors regarding some surveillance cameras change in in the area of contrast, while others use a beam associated with infra-red (IR) light, specifically in low lumination. Higher standards cameras at times use a mixture of both devices and will often have Face Priority AF where the camera can ‘See’ any face and concentrate only in that. Thank you for sharing your opinions on this blog site.

Also I believe that mesothelioma is a rare form of many forms of cancer that is often found in those previously subjected to asbestos. Cancerous tissue form within the mesothelium, which is a safety lining that covers a lot of the body’s internal organs. These cells commonly form while in the lining in the lungs, stomach, or the sac which encircles one’s heart. Thanks for sharing your ideas.

Thanks for this glorious article. One other thing is that the majority of digital cameras can come equipped with some sort of zoom lens that allows more or less of any scene being included through ‘zooming’ in and out. These types of changes in focusing length tend to be reflected inside the viewfinder and on large display screen on the back of the camera.

Yet another thing I would like to express is that in place of trying to suit all your online degree programs on days that you finish off work (as most people are drained when they go back home), try to get most of your sessions on the saturdays and sundays and only a couple courses on weekdays, even if it means taking some time away from your saturdays. This is fantastic because on the weekends, you will be a lot more rested along with concentrated with school work. Many thanks for the different points I have acquired from your site.

In the grand scheme of things you receive an A+ just for effort. Exactly where you lost me personally was on all the facts. As it is said, the devil is in the details… And it couldn’t be much more correct right here. Having said that, permit me tell you just what exactly did work. The authoring is actually incredibly convincing and that is possibly why I am taking an effort to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, despite the fact that I can easily notice the leaps in reason you come up with, I am not convinced of how you seem to unite your ideas which in turn produce the conclusion. For right now I will, no doubt yield to your point but wish in the foreseeable future you connect your dots better.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.